3,361,596 members
12,339,752 petition signatures
$17,571,785,510 diverted from Big Pharma
HPV Vaccine Might Cause Infertility (or death)
Mar 11th 2007 10:42AM by Vicki Blankenship
Merck has stopped promoting the mandatory use of Gardasil that targets the human papillomavirus (HPV). It’s probably no coincidence that their turn-around comes at the same time that reports from the National Vaccine Information Center are surfacing about fainting, dizziness and death reported by dozens of patients as side effects of Gardasil. There are also some concerns that Gardasil may cause infertility.
Legislators got that idea because the vaccine contains Polysorbate 80, which is linked to infertility in mice. The Merck HPV vaccine also contains sodium borate which is a common roach killer in each of its three doses. The National Library of Medicine (NLM) of the National Institutes of Health notes of sodium borate that it “is now known to be a dangerous poison, it is no longer commonly used in medical preparations.” That was published in 2005. Yet the FDA in 2006 approved the Merck vaccine with this “dangerous poison” to be “commonly used” in these vaccinations. The symptoms of sodium borate poisoning according to the NLM citation include many of the side effects being reported after less than six months of the vaccine usage. These include convulsions, collapse, and seizures that include twitching of facial muscles, arms, hands, legs, and feet.
How many of these young women taking this vaccine will find out that they are barren 10 to 15 years down the road and what will their options be if they are forced to take this drug because of legislation mandates?
I don’t think that ANY vaccine should be mandated! Research is proving that many cause Autism and other problems long term. If healthy foods and living, and proper supplements were promoted instead of vaccines and drugs everyone would be healthier. It looks like the risks of HPV are less than it’s vaccine.
[Reply]
Peggy Reply:
April 23rd, 2009 at 12:07 pm
At least 15 deaths have been reported from Gardasil and I agree completely with your assessment that there is a definite link between infant vacinations and autism. I have a niece and nephew with autism and proof of the link in both of their cases. Drug companies are getting rich from vacines and doctors are getting rich from drug companies at the expense of our children. It’s about time that people wake up to the risks of vacinations; too many, too soon.
[Reply]
Wonder if this is a way, to cut down on the population and we won’t know it’s happening? This would stop the birth of alot of children and kill alot of kids. Then you have all the meds. that are being pulled because they are killing our elderly or leaving them with some terrible side effects. Where have all our problems come from? When I was growing up, you didn’t hear of diabetes, like you do now. Mention the word to someone and they know someone that has it. What is FDA doing? We didn’t have refrigeration, like we do now and people weren’t getting sick and dying from what they ate. I think someone needs to be investigated, like the FDA. We spend a lot of money for this division of the government. It’s like they are trying to destroy the people of this country.
[Reply]
Cheryl Diamond Reply:
April 23rd, 2009 at 9:37 am
The FDA and the drug companies are soul mates. They might as well be one and the same agency. The medical industry has become a money making machine and they do not care about human beings just there pocket books.
This has become an atrocity and we have to fight everyday to keep ourselves healthy so we do not need the drug companies. Something they are very afraid of. It might just hurt their sales.
[Reply]
Henry Reply:
April 23rd, 2009 at 12:06 pm
Funny you should ask that question, as there is a wacky theory propounded in some quarters that suggests what we are actually witnessing now is the attempted destruction of a race line. When we look at what is being done to the planet, and food and medicine in particular, by an economic system based on principles of profit (vampiring energy) and social Darwinism, it is easy to begin to see how such a view might be given credence. As I understand it, the basis of this view is that though we appear to be human we are all hybrids. We have been led to believe that there have been visitations on Earth by non-terrestials for millenia, of which the current spate of supposed ET sightings and abductions is just the most recent manifestation. I am not a practicing Christian so cannot claim belief, but I understand that there are even biblical accounts of ‘angels’ (ie non-terrestials)entering Earth densities and mating with human females and creating offspring (the Nephilim). If that is the case then its reasonable to ask if there was physical interaction between humans and these non-terrstials what has happened to the genetic material released into the ‘human’ gene pool? Some 250,000 years ago the Annunaki (Google it) supposedly colonised Sumaria (the area around modern Iraq) and created a primate hominid slave race partly utilising human genetic material. Through a process of genetic upgrade and diversification over the next 150,000 years we arrive at the Drakonian, Jehovian Annunaki, and Anu Melchizedek Annunaki Leviathan Illumanati race strains, creating what is known as the ‘Leviathan Force’, committed to the destruction of the original Angelic Human Turaneusiam prototype seeded on Earth 550 million years ago. Please don’t start looking at your neighbour or your boss thinking he might be a member of the Leviathan races. Its a lot cleverer and more subtle than that. As we are all supposedly hybrids of these races we ALL carry varying proportions of their gene codes in addition to vestiges of the original angelic human code. This mix is expressed in the conduct of our everyday lives, and might explain why one person is judged by their actions to be an ‘angel’, and another a ‘devil’ incarnate. Or why one part of you knows you shouldn’t spread slanderous gossip about a co-worker and a another part of you relishes doing it. Or why one part of you knows you shouldn’t be doing research that involves animal experimentation but another part is fearful that you will not put food on the table for your fammily if you don’t. So we are all part of the problem as well as part of the solution. Choose carefully. Finally, I suspect this is all a load of new age hokum anyway, but it does make you wonder………
[Reply]
stephen Reply:
April 24th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Henry,
While I believe most readers will dismiss your post as absurd, after much reading and discernment via intuition & third 3rd eye ‘vision’, I have come to suspect that what you write about it is most likely correct.
Only when we as individual entities are ready to know the truth will our journey to knowledge begin. One helpful source (which often quotes Mercola) is Conscious Media Network.
Here is an interesting article related to the original Mercola story:
“Race Extermination Under the Guise of Humanitarian Aid” http://nationalexpositor.com/News/616.html
My hope is that enough of us will wake up in time to avert our further imprisonment.
[Reply]
Merck is the Dr. Mengele of the drug world, and the FDA is the SS organization. Their leaders must answer to the judgment at Nuremburg and pay the ultimate price.
[Reply]
how would you find out you’re infertile?
[Reply]
vermont Reply:
April 23rd, 2009 at 9:54 am
You can’t get preggers no matter how hard you try. Then, when you go to the doc for help, you find out that for some biological reason you are sterile.
[Reply]
Julie Reply:
May 15th, 2009 at 10:00 pm
Tori,
If you are having problems with fertility I would recommend seeing a maximized living chiropractor. Chiropractic care has helped many women in this area. The reason why is that vertebral subluxation in the lower portion of the spine places pressure on the nerves that innervate the reproductive organs. This causes damage to the nerves, and ultimately results in abnormal tissue development and loss of function. The integrity of the nerve system plays a much larger role in long-term reproductive problems, including but not limited to PMS, infertility, cysts, hormonal imbalances, and malignant cancers.
Your nerve system literally delivers life from the brain to every cell, organ, and tissue in your body. When it can function at 100%, your body can heal at 100%. When there is interference in this system due to misalignment of the spine, your body will no longer be healing at 100% and you will begin to develop disease. Symptoms of disease usually do not show up until overall function is reduced to 60% or below. Obviously proper nutrition, exercise, detoxification, and mind-body wellness is crucial for creating optimum health. However, if you cut off the nerve supply to a tissue, it doesn’t matter what you give it, it will never function. So, addressing interference in the nerve system is THE MOST IMPORTANT thing you can do for your health.
I mentioned seeing a maximized living chiropractor because these doctors incorporate advanced protocols in all 5 essentials of health, as mentioned above, including the most cutting edge spinal correction. However, there are many very good, principled chiropractors out there who could successfully correct the spine and free the nerve system of interference. Just be weary of those who focus on pain management or do not emphasize the importance of long term maintenance of the nerve system as it pertains to overall health and restoration of function. Just as it is important to eat healthy and exercise consistently, it is also important (more so) to have the spine maintained in proper alignment to support optimum nerve flow. Blessings to you, and good luck!
[Reply]
STOP MERCK FROM EXPERIMENTING ON PEOPLE !
[Reply]
The pharmaceutical industry is the biggest cause of death in the US it has been reported. Outleads all other causes combined.
One must look after ones own health and be diligent and ALWAYS question your doctors authority, as many do not have your best interests in mind.
No wonder that herb use is up thousands of percent.
[Reply]
Thank YOU for printing this info. Too many parents trust whatever big Pharma tells them. I feel this drug will sterilize our daughters for sure. Another try at Eugenics.
[Reply]
LL Reply:
August 23rd, 2009 at 10:00 pm
Interesting theory but there are regulatory actions of the government which absolutely forbids them from approving a product that could cause sterility.
[Reply]
I have had two gynecologists in a row push me repeatedly to get this vaccine. My reply was: it hasn’t been around long enough for me to feel that its benefits outweigh potential risks. And this did not seem reasonable to either of these doctors, who were extremely reasonable on other points during my appointments. I had some doubts about whether I was making the right decision but at least I was making one – as an adult in her mid-twenties. What on earth could have convinced the government that it is reasonable to mandate this vaccine for children?!
[Reply]
Stan Reply:
April 23rd, 2009 at 3:17 pm
Good points, A.S., and well done for standing up to the pressure. There are a number of possible answers here.
(1) Merck had just lost Vioxx, a major money-spinner for them, and they needed a quick reversal of fortunes. (2) It’s a high-water-mark time for the medical-pharmaceutical-government complex, and this vax was a natural with which to play the mandatory card; easily propagandized. (3) Pediatricians may be getting a nice little earner for pushing it. (4) Concerns about its having anti-fertility factors in it may be worth exploring. Some years ago the Powers That Be put such an ingredient in tetanus shots given to young girls in a number of 3rd world countries, which were found later to be not so innocent after all. An ex-CIA man was interviewed some years later, and admitted on video that they were behind it, for reasons of ‘national security’ for the US: to keep the teeming hordes from pouring into the country if an economic collapse came. Rather prescient of them. Also to keep down the numbers of ‘useless eaters’ that such of our Overlords as H Kissinger refer to, about the mass of mankind, who need to be eliminated, one way or another. Read: wars, pestilence – and infertility.
We the People need to look after our own interests. The PTB are certainly looking after their own.
[Reply]
Nleeguitar Reply:
April 23rd, 2009 at 7:46 pm
I heard a pediatrician say that the HPV stood for “Help Pay for Vioxx”.
[Reply]
Anyone concerned about the ingredients in mandated vaccines–check out the above website.
DPT-Tetanus contains formaldehyde.
Tripedia – Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Aventis Pasteur USA 800.VACCINE
*Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Clostridium tetani toxoids and acellular Bordetella pertussis adsorbed aluminum potassium sulfate, formaldehyde, thimerosal, and polysorbate 80 (Tween-80) gelatin, bovine extract
Info taken from website: Nat’l Cancer Institute
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/risk/formaldehyde#q4#q4
Formaldehyde has been classified as a human carcinogen (cancer-causing substance) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and as a probable human carcinogen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Formaldehyde is a colorless, flammable, strong-smelling gas. It is an important industrial chemical used to manufacture building materials and to produce many household products. It is used in pressed wood products such as particleboard, plywood, and fiberboard, glues and adhesives, permanent press fabrics, paper product coatings, and certain insulation materials. In addition, formaldehyde is commonly used as an industrial fungicide, germicide, and disinfectant, and as a preservative in mortuaries and medical laboratories.
[Reply]
As a nurse I know all too well the politics of vaccination! MONEY!!! There is no reason other than the drug companies financial gain for this ridiculous vaccination!
[Reply]
To Whom it May Concern: I purposely did not allow my two daughters ages 12 and 14 to get this HPV vaccine by Merck since I knew the facts were not back on the long term effects of this new vaccine.
[Reply]
The irony of all of it is that this vaccine is only as popular as it is because people are motivated based on fear. I mean, think about it; this vaccine is supposed to prevent the spread of specific types of HPV linked with cases of cervical cancer and the idea is that, if you vaccinate the girls young enough, if they have unprotected sex, they won’t get the virus that is linked with cervical cancer. What is wrong with this picture?!?! What about educating our children that unprotected sex is a health risk and that they should be careful when and with whom they choose to engage in sexual activity?!?! I was raised in a fairly conservative family, but my mother gave me ALL of the information that I needed to make safe decisions, so that if I engaged in behaviour that she disapproved of before marriage, at least I was armed with a way to protect myself from STDs and pregnancy. She didn’t leave it up to the school to teach me, where I would have been too busy laughing that the teacher said anatomical words that I found amusing.
It’s unfortunate that parents are so motivated from fear that they relinquish all of their power to keep their children safe and relegate it to someone they barely know (i.e. doctors, government agencies etc.)
Gardasil is a way for parents to feel that their children are protected when they aren’t in the bedroom with them, and it’s unfortunate that now people are beginning to realise that the effects of such treatments are far-reaching. We don’t know what is going to happen ten or fifteen years down the road. I bet the parents will be kicking themselves if their kids can’t give them grandchildren or god forbid something worse happens.
Sorry for the diatribe but with so many amazing anti-viral supplements out there, why would I want to give big pharma my money? They profit off the repeat visits of me being sick, not necessarily the vaccine itself. Check out the video “Food Matters.” It’s amazing the way that they present the “War on Cancer.” It sums up how these companies make their money. If there was a pill that someone could take to treat cancer, there would be no money to make because they would take it once and be “cured.” No no no, where they make the real money is off the repeat visits–the chemo, radiation, frequent doctor visits, surgeries, and the like.
[Reply]
Nina Reply:
April 27th, 2009 at 1:26 pm
These reports are a real eye opener. I learned a while ago that certain types of cervical cancer are linked to the HPV. It’s been in medical literature for years. So I guess it was just a matter of time before a drug company jumped on a vaccine. What none of the ads for the vaccine talk about and should is that HPV, the virus that’s linked to cervical cancer is sexually transmitted. If a young woman is having unprotected sex, HPV is not the only concern. If anyone really listens, the fast disclaimer at the end of the commercial states that Gardasil does not protect against HIV and sexually transmitted diseases. Once again the public is jumping at a cure for the symptom, not the disease! If the couple are faithfully using condoms, (as they should) this would not be an issue. This vaccine isn’t really protection, if even one young women doesn’t fully protect herself at every encounter. Education is truly needed here. Not another vaccine.
[Reply]
Candy Reply:
May 4th, 2009 at 5:41 pm
Just a side note. Condoms don’t even protect from most STD’s. Especially HPV, which is transmitted by skin-to-skin contact, just like herpes. And think, if condoms are only 99% effective against sperm (pregnancy), which are way larger than a virus, what makes you think a condom can block the HIV virus?? What people really need is good moral teaching.
[Reply]
LL Reply:
August 23rd, 2009 at 10:02 pm
Condoms have been the only proven method to prevent HIV besides abstinence. Where are you gathering your information regarding HIV’s ability to pentrate condoms?
Some years back I had the opportunity to present a nutritional/diet/environmental relationship for ADD/ADHD to a local CHADD organization. This presentation was based on collected data and documentation from a Professor of Education who dedicated a good part of her career in research and training of educators who specifically dealt with learning disorders.
CHADD is a “support” organization for families/children with ADD/ADHD. After presenting my information to the local board for review and consideration, I was told they had “no interest in pursuing this alternative or even presenting it to the membership(families)” Being a supposed non biased group I couldn’t understand why they would not even consider this non invasive, healthy option. They “misplaced” all the material I gave to them, never to be returned. Upon researching further I came to find out a major portion of CHADD’s budget was funded by the drug company that developed/sold Ritalin. For other examples of pharma abuse log onto cchr.org and request free information on the “Making a Killing” DVD. Then share with everyone you care about.
[Reply]
Drug companies and our govt are putting young girls at risk and their motivation is the money and the not quite bright are buying into the propaganda generated to make a bad thing look good,”for the good of the young girls’…in actual fact it will eventually come out that it will make many girls sterile and cause a multitude of other health issues.
[Reply]
I got the Gardasil shot two years ago in January. Took it, and got horribly sick. I ended up in the hospital for 4 days after visiting the ER 3 times. I had a high fever (105), back pain and was sick all the time. It all started the week after the shot. It turns out I had multiple abscesses in my kidneys. Of course, there is no proof that the shot caused my illness. I have never had kidney infections before, nor since. I have also never been hospitalized for any illness. Funny how those things just happen. It’s all a coincidence. Maybe I could get the second shot and see if the same thing happens again…It’s called testing, but I guess they dont really do that with vaccinations.
[Reply]
A few years ago I tested positive for HPV, and had stage II displasia – stated precursor to cervical cancer – which is now fully resolved, with no sign of either showing up on routine and specific testing. I can say from personal experience that even if I did progress into cervical cancer, I would not have wanted to take the risk that this HPV vaccines poses. It is not the government’s or pharmaceutical’s place to mandate what is taken. It is up to the consumer. Provide the product, and if the consumer does not buy, that is that. In the end the decision has to be left to the idiocy or intelligence of the consumer.
[Reply]
Erin Reply:
April 27th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
I agree with you completely; HPV generally resolves itself in most people with a decent-functioning immune system and the majority of sexually active individuals will test positive for it at one point in their life or another.
[Reply]
I have secondary infertility. I got my first shot and my periods went from 28 days to up to 46 days. We just started trying for a baby. The month before the shot, i had a positive test. then i had whats called spontaneous abortion. (the body forces it out). So i had the ability t get pregnant. I no longer do. I have been trying for a baby with my fiance for 1 year, 4 months. The docs have no explanation. I do. It was the shots. My periods were never irregular. I always knew when i was ovulating. The gardasil messed up my body. Like i said, my periods are always late. I rarely ovulate. THis is a serious problem..
[Reply]
Amy Reply:
September 2nd, 2009 at 2:19 am
Try a surrogate Mom.
[Reply]
I am learning more and more about vaccinations and the health risks and health problems they incur. It enrages me that Merck is so adamant about promoting the “health” of this vaccine (and others) and its benefits when cases have proven otherwise. They are simply a greedy company!
A couple of years ago I was reading an article (right after Gardasil was approved by the FDA) that Merck pushed and pushed the FDA to approve the vaccine before testing had been done to prove its safety. It was uncovered that Merck was pushing Gardasil’s approval because another vaccine/drug they were responsible for producing had adverse reactions as well(it was so long ago I can’t remember the drug name). Because of lawsuits they were going to lose all of their money and needed another drug to bring in the money to stay afloat. This just proves to me that Merck is a company concerned only about their well being and not that of society’s.
[Reply]
I have a very different theory to this but I believe this is a way for the govermentn to try and stop teen pregnancies. If it causes infertility then teenage girls can’t get pregnant. But the government are also worried about over population in years to come . Could this be there way of trying to stop the overpopulation? Gets you thinking.
I’m only 14 my mum wants me to have the vaccine but I’m not to sure. I don’t want to become infertile or die if there are those chances.
[Reply]
I got the vaccine all three shots. I finished with it about a month ago. I was just reading this article today and i have been thinking about the possibility of being infertile and i am a little scared. My mom kept up with me getitng it she really wanted me to so i did for her i wonder if she looked at the risk. I didn’t take a close risk. I hope it doesn’t affect me horribly. Being infertile is one of my biggest fears.
[Reply]
any drugs have it’s own side effects. (well, most of it) To make safe, I guess just do the old but natural way of it.
[Reply]
I’ve read about Polysorbate 80 on many sites, and most of them say that if you eat it it can’t harm your reproductive system, but WHEN INJECTED, it is likely to cause infertility, even in small amounts (Polysorbate 80 is in many vaccines, actually). This is scary… I intend to have children someday and I wouldn’t want to take anything that contained a chemical which could result in sterility.
[Reply]
That’s perfect that people can receive the business loans moreover, it opens new possibilities.
[Reply]