Home » Bird Flu, H1N1, Pandemic, Swine Flu, Vaccines

Swine Flu Is Spreading Wider Than Official Data Show

Submitted by on May 26, 2009 – 7:21 am2 Comments

H1N1 JapanMay 25 (Bloomberg) — Swine flu is spreading more widely than official figures indicate, with outbreaks in Europe and Asia showing it’s gained a foothold in at least three regions.

One in 20 cases is being officially reported in the U.S., meaning more than 100,000 people have probably been infected nationwide with the new H1N1 flu strain, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In the U.K., the virus may be 300 times more widespread than health authorities have said, the Independent on Sunday reported yesterday.

Japan, which has reported the most cases in Asia, began reopening schools at the weekend after health officials said serious medical complications had not emerged in those infected. The virus is now spreading in the community in Australia, Jim Bishop, the nation’s chief medical officer, said yesterday.

“I think we will see the number rise,” Bishop told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio today after confirming the nation’s 17th case and saying test results are pending on 41 others. “This is going to be a marathon rather than a sprint.”

Forty-six countries have confirmed 12,515 cases, including 91 deaths, according to the World Health Organization’s latest tally. Almost four of every five cases were in Mexico and the U.S., where the pig-derived strain was discovered last month. Most of those infected experience an illness similar to that of seasonal flu. The main difference is that the new H1N1 strain is persisting outside the Northern Hemisphere winter.

Summer Disease?

“While we are seeing activities decline in some areas, we should expect to see more cases, more hospitalizations and perhaps more deaths over the weeks ahead and possibly into the summer,” Anne Schuchat, CDC’s interim deputy director for science and public health program, told reporters on a May 22 conference call.

The U.S. has officially reported 6,552 probable and confirmed cases, Schuchat said. “These are just the tip of the iceberg. We are estimating more than 100,000 people probably have this virus now in the U.S.”

There have been nine deaths and more than 300 known hospitalizations, she said. The fatalities exclude a woman in her 50s who died in New York over the weekend.

China reported cases today in Shanghai and the eastern province of Zhejiang, taking its tally of confirmed infections to 12. Taiwan confirmed the island’s first domestically transmitted case and reported two imported infections, giving it nine. South Korea confirmed 12 more cases, bringing its total to 22, while the Philippines confirmed a second infection today.

Caribbean Honeymoon

Russia’s health ministry confirmed the country’s second case, in a man who honeymooned in the Dominican Republic. He returned from the Caribbean May 18 and was hospitalized two days later in the Kaluga region southwest of Moscow, Gennady Onishchenko, head of the ministry’s public health department, said on state television today. His wife wasn’t infected.

Japan has the most cases outside North America, with 345 as of today, according to the health ministry. Chile’s tally reached 74 after 19 cases were recorded yesterday, while Argentina’s total increased by three to five.

Eighteen European countries have confirmed 349 cases, a third of whom were probably infected in their home country, the Stockholm-based European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control said in a report yesterday. The U.K. and Spain have the most reported cases, with 133 each. About 60 percent of cases in the U.K. are linked to “in-country transmission,” ECDC said.

Thousands of people have caught the virus in the U.K. and suffered mild symptoms, or none at all, over the past weeks, John Oxford, professor of virology at the University of London, told the Independent.

Already a Pandemic

Community spread of the new virus in a second region means WHO’s criteria for a pandemic has been met, said Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy of the University of Minneapolis.

Britain’s Health Secretary Alan Johnson told WHO Director- General Margaret Chan at the organization’s annual meeting last week that disease severity and other determinants besides geographic spread need to be considered before the pandemic alert is raised to the highest of WHO’s 6-level scale.

“The move to phase 6 means that emergency plans are instantly triggered around the globe, and in the U.K. this would mean increased vigilance and activation of the UK’s own ‘inter- pandemic’ phases,” the U.K.’s Department of Health said in a May 18 statement.

At phase 6, many pharmaceutical companies would switch from making seasonal flu shots to pandemic-specific vaccine, potentially creating shortages of an immunization to counter the normal winter flu season, the department said.

‘Risk of Harm’

WHO is reviewing its pandemic response plans, including the prerequisites for a pandemic, in the wake of the swine flu threat, said Keiji Fukuda, the agency’s assistant director- general of health security and environment. A move to phase 6 would “signify a really substantial increase in risk of harm to people,” Fukuda told reporters during a May 22 briefing.

Some of the guidelines were prepared in anticipation of a pandemic sparked by the H5N1 strain of avian flu, which killed 61 percent of 429 people confirmed to have contracted that virus, Chan told the World Health Assembly on May 18. “This has left our world better prepared, but also very scared,” she said.

Rather than redefine what constitutes a pandemic, health officials should help people understand the current threat may resemble the 1957 or 1968 pandemics, in which fewer than 4 million people died, rather than the 1918 Spanish flu, blamed for killing about 50 million, said Osterholm at the University of Minneapolis.

“The bigger problem is scientific integrity,” he said. “If they want to change the definition, then go ahead. But don’t say that we are not in phase 6 right now because we don’t want to go there.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Jason Gale in Singapore at j.gale@bloomberg.net

Related posts:

  1. Why Monsanto’s Attempt to “Disappear” Tumours by Using Historical Control Data is Invalid An Earth Open Source briefing Summary Monsanto has invoked...
  2. New SARS-Like Virus Found, Man Critically Ill in UK A Qatari man struck down with a previously unknown...
  3. Shocking Scans Show The Real Impact of Love on a Child’s Brain You comfort them over a skinned knee in the...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

2 Comments »

  • Brooke says:

    When reading your email of 5/30/2009, I was struck by an error in the following computations:

    World Wide H1N1 Confirmed Cases and Deaths (confirmed cases include deaths):
    Cases: 12,954 (100% World Wide Cases)
    Deaths: 92 (100% World Wide Deaths)
    Mortality Rate: 0.73%
    Deaths per 1,000 cases: 7.3

    United States:
    Cases: 6,764 (52% United States Cases)
    Deaths: 10 (11% World Wide Deaths)
    Mortality Rate: 0.15%
    Deaths per 1,000 cases: 1.5

    First, I don’t understand why you show the number of US deaths as a percentage of World deaths when what would be more important is US deaths as a percentage of US deaths (as done with World deaths, of which one would assume US deaths are part, inasmuch as US is part of World).

    Last, I am not a mathematician – nor do I play one on TV – but I was taught to do percentages by the author of “Modern Factor Analysis,” who said that to find the percentage of a number to another, one takes the lower number and divides it by the higher number.

    Ergo, 10 (# US deaths) divided by 6,764 (# US cases) = 0.0014784 which is a far cry from your percentage, 0.15 (which is 15%), which you seem to have exterpolated from the incorrect percentage determined above. As to # US deaths per 1,000 – just looking at the figures – HAS to be less than 1 per thousand.

    I would be very leery of an organization which, even with the best intentions, leads the public to believe that the percentage of deaths per 1,000 is 15%, when the actual percentage is one-tenth of one percent.

    If I am incorrect, I apologize; if you are, you need to correct the impression you have given.

    C. Brooke Gruenberg

  • admin says:

    The comparison of US vs. World is to illustrate the cases reported are primarily in the US and we need to be vigilant no mater what the press has to say. In my opinion the swine flu has been toned down because it is hurting the economy and the travel industry. And after all money is more important than your health in their eyes.

    Part of the algorithm often forgotten is to multiply by 100 (10 / 6764 * 100 = 0.0014784). Which would give you 0.15 (rounded to 2 decimal points). Thus 1000 x .15% = 1.5 per 1,000

    The current figures (05/29/2009) show continued progression of this threat. And as the CDC admits, for each confirmed case of H1N1 there are at least 20 that have been undetected. Bringing an estimated 310,200 cases worldwide.

    World Wide H1N1 Confirmed Cases and Deaths (confirmed cases include deaths):
    Cases: 15,510 (100% World Wide Cases)
    Deaths: 99 (100% World Wide Deaths)
    Mortality Rate: 0.64%
    Deaths per 1,000 cases: 6.4

    United States:
    Cases: 7,927 (51% United States Cases)
    Deaths: 11 (11% World Wide Deaths)
    Mortality Rate: 0.14%
    Deaths per 1,000 cases: 1.4

    I do hope the trend slows down but I’m afraid it shows no sign of that.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.