Baxter, Novartis and GSK Filed Patents for Swine Flu Jab in 2008 and 2006
According to WHO, the “swine flu” H1N1 virus is so new that it counts as a deadly threat to us and a pandemic level 6 declaration is justified.
However, three of the major pharmaceutical companies that sat as “observers” on WHO’s
vaccine advisory board which recommended their “swine flu” jabs to fight the swine flu “pandemic” in July filed patents for a “swine flu” vaccine long before the virus appeared allegedly for the first time in Mexico in April 2009.
Baxter, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline filed patents in 2008 and 2006.
Baxter (Kistner Pharm) Files Swine Flu Vaccine 2008 Patent a Year Ahead of Outbreak
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?9Acontext=va&aid=14430
(Patent US 20090060950 A1)
Novartis of Switzerland …applied for it’s Swine Flu Vaccine patent on Nov. 6, 2006 3 Years Ahead Of Outbreak
http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2009/09/18/swine-flu-vaccine-patent-conspiracy/
(Patent US 20090047353) for a ‘split Influenza Vaccine with Adjuvants
GlaxoSmithKline’s 2006 Pandemrix H1N1 flu virus vaccine Filed 3 Years Ahead Of Outbreak
http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk/news.php?start=2900&end=2920&view=yes&id=3825#newspost
(Patent WO2006100109 A1) to GSK Filed 21st March 2006
http://www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1668%3Abaxter-novartis-and-gsk-filed-patents-for-qswine-fluq-jab-in-2008-and-2006&catid=1%3Alatest-news&Itemid=64&lang=en
Related posts:
- U.S. Supreme Court to Review Monsanto Seed Patents The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to consider...
- Scientists Sue Merck: Allege Fraud, Mislabeling, and False Certification of MMR Vaccine. Vaccinationists tell us we don’t understand science. Well maybe...
- Vaccine Genetically Engineers People to Stop Smoking: Planned for Children An upcoming vaccine contains a genetically engineered virus designed...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
3,561,596 members
12,429,752 petition signatures
$19,571,785,510 diverted from Big Pharma



You really do have to see which sub strain of “H1N1″ the patent was for.
major H1N1 strain has been around and recorded in early 90s. The patents that were filed weren’t for the same sub strain as the one that is in circulation.
Feel free to verify this information
I had heard this before. The fact that this is not front page news says one of two things. One, it is not true, or two, it is true, and our problems are greater than we can imagine.
Good job! NOW, get the story into the mainstream media!!!
The information will never make the mainstream media because it is controlled by BIG PHARM and BIG MEDICINE! Same as “our” govt…