Home » Big Agri, FDA, Future of Food, Uncategorized

New Raw Milk Legislation in 9 States Could Deter FDA Scrutiny

Submitted by on March 22, 2011 – 10:00 pm5 Comments

Last year brought a crackdown on raw milk and cheese sales in response to their increase in popularity with consumers. The FDA raids were conducted usually over small legal infractions regarding proper sales and labeling. What lies below is a breakdown of new bills being presented by nine different states that will clarify and in some cases expand opportunities for raw milk producers to share their goods.

This is a breath of fresh air after seeing the FDA team up with big-ag milk producers to squash people’s ability to access and consume truly nutritious products instead of continuing to rely on corporate produced dairy.

It’s wonderful progress to see such action to solidify these farmers’ rights and ability to provide safe and nutritious goods. Let’s hope it slows down the unnecessary raids and undue scrutiny so that raw food choice continues to grow in popularity and availability for consumers seeking healthier alternatives.

~Health Freedoms

A number of raw milk bills have been introduced in the state Houses in the current legislative session. What follows is a state-by-state summary of the bills that have been introduced.

IOWA – House File 394 (HF 394), a bill that will allow the sale of raw milk and raw milk products to individuals on the farm and through delivery by producers, was voted out of the House Economic Growth Committee and was scheduled to go to the full House for a vote. Dairy farmers selling under the bill would be subject neither to licensing nor inspection. State law currently prohibits any sale of raw milk and raw milk products other than cheese aged sixty days or more. Supporters of the bill subsequently determined they did not have the votes for passage and withdrew the bill from the House debate calendar. With the Iowa legislative session being two years, the bill can be put back on the debate calendar next January without having to be either reintroduced or passed through committee again.

MASSACHUSETTS – Legislation has been introduced that would allow licensed raw milk farmers to deliver raw milk directly to the consumer off site from the farm. The farmer may also contract with a third party to deliver raw milk to the consumer. Current law allows only the on-farm sale of raw milk by licensed farmers. In the last year, the Massachusetts Department of Agriculture and Resources (MDAR) has threatened enforcement action against buyers clubs that have sent agents out to the farm to pick up raw milk for club members.

A second bill, the “cowshare” bill, would establish the right of those who have a partial or complete ownership interest in a dairy animal to legally obtain milk from that animal for the owners own personal use. The bill was introduced in response to recent threat by MDAR that it will take action against farmers operating cow- or herd-share programs.

MINNESOTA – Current statute allows the sale of raw milk and cream “occasionally secured or purchased for personal use by any consumer at the place or farm where the milk is produced”; this is in conflict with the Minnesota Constitution which provides that one may sell or peddle the products of the farm occupied and cultivated by that person. A bill has been introduced that would rectify the inconsistency. HF255 (and companion bill SF147) would allow direct farm-to-consumer sales and delivery of raw milk and raw milk products such as cream, butter, yogurt and cheese on a regular basis. Delivery can also be made by either the seller’s or buyer’s agent and can take place at farmers’ markets, farmstands or designated delivery sites among other locations. In the past year, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has cracked down on the delivery of raw milk, even executing a criminal search warrant at a consumer’s residence where delivery took place.

NEW JERSEY – Assembly Bill 743 (and companion bill S-2702) would allow the sale of raw milk and raw milk products (e.g., yogurt, kefir, butter and cheese) by a licensed dairy either directly to consumers or to retail stores. The bill also states that if a farmer and the consumer enter into a contract for shared ownership of a cow no raw milk permit shall be required. Current law prohibits the sale of raw milk and raw milk products except for cheese aged sixty days or more. The bill has been voted out of the Agricultural and Natural Resources Committee and is going to the full Assembly for a vote.

OREGON – House Bill HB 2222 would allow the licensed sale of raw milk and raw milk products direct to consumers and to retail stores. Current law allows the unlicensed sale of raw milk on the farm by dairies with no more than two producing dairy cows, nine producing goats or nine producing sheep. The new bill would not affect this microdairy exception.

TENNESSEE – House Bill 898 seeks to clarify Tennessee’s “cowshare” law. The bill simply states that no law “shall be construed as prohibiting the independent or partial owner of any hooved animal from using the milk from the animal or a dairy product made from such milk for the owner’s personal consumption or other personal use.” Current law provides that the milk from the animal can be used for the owner’s personal use but does not mention the right to have that milk processed into other dairy products.

TEXAS – HB 75 would expand the venues where licensed dairy farmers can sell raw milk and raw cheese aged sixty days or more. Currently, licensees can only sell raw milk on the farm. The new law would enable the farmer to sell directly to a consumer at the consumer’s residence or “any other location where producers customarily sell their products directly to consumers” (e.g. at farmers’ markets, farmstands). DairyMax, a regional dairy promotion organization, violated the law by running ads attacking raw milk to discourage support of the bill. Federal law only allows dairy check-off fees to go toward promoting milk and milk products.

WASHINGTON – Legislation has been introduced that would exempt from regulation on-farm raw milk sales if the farm has no more than two producing cows, nine producing goats, or nine producing sheep. Current law allows the sale of raw milk only by licensed dairies.

WYOMING – Legislation (HB 0017) was introduced that would have legalized cowshare, goatshare and herdshare contracts–“herd” being defined as no more than five lactating cows or ten lactating goats. There’s currently no law prohibiting herdshares; however, the Wyoming Department of Agriculture views raw milk distribution through share programs as being the illegal sale of raw milk and recently sent ‘cease and desist’ letters to several farmers it suspected of operating shareholder dairies.

By Pete Kennedy, Esq.

http://www.farmtoconsumer.org/raw-milk-bills-031011.htm

Related posts:

  1. Eating Meat and Dairy Products Linked to Early Puberty Parents need to worry about this: early puberty in...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

5 Comments »

  • Steve says:

    Too bad Michigan’s not on the list. We tried a cow share program in the past but don’t have enough milk drinkers in the house to make it worthwhile (the long drive to pick it up). So today we don’t drink cow milk in the house. I talk tongue in cheek (briefly) about all these food issues in my sci fi novel, where “real food” is sold at a premium.

  • Marcus says:

    I have recently started drinking milk again after twenty years without it. I gave up milk when I learned of the hormones, pesticides, antibiotics and contaminants that the FDA allows.
    I am able to buy raw milk from a farmer who sells it for pet consumption only. I feel as if I’m doing a drug deal each time I buy it.
    The FDA cannot be allowed to dictate what foods Americans are allowed to consume. They rob the people of a healthy choice.
    Raw milk has help cure the digestive problems I have has for years. This is because raw milk is full of beneficial bacteria and enzymes our bodies need, and the taste is incredibly delicious.

  • A recent Supreme Court ruling virtually states that we don’t have the right to choose what foods we eat because the FDA simply has the right to arbitrarily decide what is in the public’s best interest. However, I can NOT tolerate commercially produced, pasteurized milk, and work with many folks in the same boat. Most of our child population cannot handle casein, and much of our child population is very, very digestively ill. Yet many children (including some with autism) can handle unpasteurized milk.

    It makes perfect sense – raw milk still contains the active enzymes that enable our bodies to break it down. Heat kills those enzymes. So when we drink pasteurized milk, our bodies have no idea what that garbage is! It becomes just another toxin in the sea already full of toxins, increases inflammation, and is not well-digested.

    If anyone truly thinks the FDA is looking out for our health, they are sadly deluded. Just read the roster of FDA officials – former big wigs and stockholders of Monsanto (the originators of GMO foods), large food company former executives, etc. This is yet again an example of the degradation of our nation into a “corporatocracy.”

    Fight back, folks, fight back!

  • Anon says:

    Idaho got new regs making it much easier to produce and sell fresh milk, but not as good and what Ore. has or is proposed for Wash.

    We can have four cows, sell the milk [not retail], but must obtain a permit[$], up-to-date vaccinations, somatic cell count testing monthly, be ready for spot inspections, yata, yata, yata…there was something about labeling as UNPASTEURIZED, too, if memory serves.

    I downloaded the PDF of the new regs from the State’s Dept. of Ag. website, as we have a number of one or two cow producers, and several goat milk producers hereabouts.

    I don’t think the “regulators” are going to get very much compliance, at least not around here, and the producers will just become more selective and cautious and put more limitations on whom they’ll trust with buying.

    The hinterlands of Idaho has many who do not want the gov’t so intimately involved in the conduct of their daily lives, neither buyers nor sellers…they are very independent-minded folk who refuse to buckle-under.

  • Brigitte Ruthman says:

    The trend in government control of food rights can only be changed through education. The only way to stop the propaganda machine fueled by the FDA, agribusiness and state ag agencies is through a concerted grass roots effort.
    You can argue these points forever- but the science is now emerging to support it- there is no great risk of illness from fresh milk. With 10 million regular consumers and 85 illnesses, the risk pales by comparison to other food contaminations in the commercial food stream.
    My farm was targeted by the Massachusetts Dept. of Agriculture, which tried to shut it down. I was milking one cow. Science also reveals that food safety is much better on small farms than the industrial ones which depend on antibiotics, growth hormones, and small spaces to create profit.
    The problem is that many people, especially those in urban areas, have no idea they are being fed propaganda aimed at profit, not health.
    As Sally Fallon has said- this is a matter of “America, wake up.” Silence will mean surrender, and submission to food that lacks life.
    It is simply our right to choose what we eat.
    Brigitte

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.