Home » Big Agri, Environment, Future of Food, Nutrition

Eco-Farming Can Double Food Production In 10 Years, Says New UN Report

Submitted by on March 24, 2011 – 10:30 pm2 Comments

A new UN report offers more evidence of a need to end expansion of conventional farming practices that are decimating the earth. These practices will not fulfill the needs of a growing and currently undernourished general world population. Agroecological methods are designed to enhance soil productivity and utilization of natural pest controls such as beneficial plants and insects. This report indicates those methods as being the key to doubling food convention within 10 years.

This information offers similar findings and solutions as the Worldwatch Institute report that calls to end factory farms and wants small scale farming fostered as the solution to world hunger. As the USDA paves the way for a rise in GMOs by approving three new major bioengineered crops for spring planting, many signs are pointing for the halt of their use and other practices of the giant agriculture industry.

Claims that GMOs and farming practices that rely on constant tilling and spraying is going to provide the world’s food is proving more and more to be an elaborate hoax. “Conventional farming relies on expensive inputs, fuels climate change and is not resilient to climatic shocks. It simply is not the best choice anymore today,” says Oliver De Schutter, UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food. De Shutter goes on, “A large segment of the scientific community now acknowledges the positive impacts of agroecology on food production, poverty alleviation and climate change mitigation — and this is what is needed in a world of limited resources.”

Americans aren’t very familiar with limited resources yet, though with the way things are going, will probably soon realize. Now is the time to become aware of the possibilities beyond the supermarket shelves. From a home garden to a farmers market; alternative, small-scale farming is something that needs the support of a world depending on its success.

~Health Freedoms

GENEVA (8 March 2011) – Small-scale farmers can double food production within 10 years in critical regions by using ecological methods, a new UN report* shows. Based on an extensive review of the recent scientific literature, the study calls for a fundamental shift towards agroecology as a way to boost food production and improve the situation of the poorest.

“To feed 9 billion people in 2050, we urgently need to adopt the most efficient farming techniques available,” says Olivier De Schutter, UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food and author of the report. “Today’s scientific evidence demonstrates that agroecological methods outperform the use of chemical fertilizers in boosting food production where the hungry live — especially in unfavorable environments.”

Agroecology applies ecological science to the design of agricultural systems that can help put an end to food crises and address climate-change and poverty challenges. It enhances soils productivity and protects the crops against pests by relying on the natural environment such as beneficial trees, plants, animals and insects.

“To date, agroecological projects have shown an average crop yield increase of 80% in 57 developing countries, with an average increase of 116% for all African projects,” De Schutter says. “Recent projects conducted in 20 African countries demonstrated a doubling of crop yields over a period of 3-10 years.”

“Conventional farming relies on expensive inputs, fuels climate change and is not resilient to climatic shocks. It simply is not the best choice anymore today,” De Schutter stresses. “A large segment of the scientific community now acknowledges the positive impacts of agroecology on food production, poverty alleviation and climate change mitigation — and this is what is needed in a world of limited resources. Malawi, a country that launched a massive chemical fertilizer subsidy program a few years ago, is now implementing agroecology, benefiting more than 1.3 million of the poorest people, with maize yields increasing from 1 ton/ha to 2-3 tons/ha.”

The report also points out that projects in Indonesia, Vietnam and Bangladesh recorded up to 92 % reduction in insecticide use for rice, leading to important savings for poor farmers. “Knowledge came to replace pesticides and fertilizers. This was a winning bet, and comparable results abound in other African, Asian and Latin American countries,” the independent expert notes.

“The approach is also gaining ground in developed countries such as United States, Germany or France,” he said. “However, despite its impressive potential in realizing the right to food for all, agroecology is still insufficiently backed by ambitious public policies and consequently hardly goes beyond the experimental stage.”

The report identifies a dozen measures that States should implement to scale up agroecological practices.

“Agroecology is a knowledge-intensive approach. It requires public policies supporting agricultural research and participative extension services,” De Schutter says. “States and donors have a key role to play here. Private companies will not invest time and money in practices that cannot be rewarded by patents and which don’t open markets for chemical products or improved seeds.”

The Special Rapporteur on the right to food also urges States to support small-scale farmer’s organizations, which demonstrated a great ability to disseminate the best agroecological practices among their members. “Strengthening social organization proves to have as much impact as distributing fertilizers. Small-scale farmers and scientists can create innovative practices when they partner”, De Schutter explains.

“We won’t solve hunger and stop climate change with industrial farming on large plantations. The solution lies in supporting small-scale farmers’ knowledge and experimentation, and in raising incomes of smallholders so as to contribute to rural development.”

“If key stakeholders support the measures identified in the report, we can see a doubling of food production within 5 to 10 years in some regions where the hungry live,” De Schutter says. “Whether or not we will succeed in this transition will depend on our ability to learn faster from recent innovations. We need to go fast if we want to avoid repeated food and climate disasters in the 21st century.”

Olivier De Schutter was appointed the Special Rapporteur on the right to food in May 2008 by the United Nations Human Rights Council. He is independent from any government or organization.

(*) The report “Agro-ecology and the right to food” was presented today before the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. This document is available in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish at: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/food/annual.htm

-http://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=10819&LangID=E

Related posts:

  1. New Report: Americans Eating Their Weight In Genetically Engineered Food Do you think you eat much genetically engineered food?...
  2. GMO Farming, Glyphosate Significant Causes of Water Pollution Water pollution and air pollution has been and continues...
  3. Cancer-Causing Flame Retardants Remain in Homes Years After Being Banned  Chemicals designed to slow household fires continue to be found...
  4. Pesticides Threaten Thailand’s Reputation as Food Exporter SANPATONG, THAILAND — Thailand has long been recognized as a...
  5. “Food Environment” in Schools Getting a Bit Better Researchers found that on a scale from zero to...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

2 Comments »

  • Craig Blacklock says:

    I am totally supportive of this kind of change in agriculture. I do, however, take exception to the thinking that we need to be able to solve the problem of “feeding 9 billion people by 2050″. The solution, along with a change if agriculture, is to “avoid having 9 billion people”. The world cannot sustain 9 billion, nor the current 7 billion, even if we can feed them.

    We are currently causing between 100 and 200 species to go extinct each day. We are losing wild places needed both for wildlife, and for our own species to recreate in. Carbon emissions have directly followed the population curve.

    For many reasons, we must immediately create a change of thinking so that world-wide, people voluntarily adopt a “one child” policy. This will also have the very positive impact of lifting families out of poverty.

    So, please! Stop repeating the myth that we have not choice but climbing to 9 billion, and start educating people on why and how we must avoid it!

  • Beverly says:

    Craig, I can see you have been convinced by the agenda to do it their way. The reason we can’t support 7 billion people is because of the choices we have made to increase energy flux density. Nuclear energy is the ONLY way we can support our population right now and in the future. We need to move in that direction or people have to die. The healthcare, the green agenda, the food industry are all designed to eliminate people not to save or feed them. Solar and wind are parochial compared to nuclear. Educating people on the scientific facts would be a great start. Great scientific information is available at http://www.larouchepac.com

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.