Home » Air Pollution, Big Agri, Children's Health, Food Toxins, Future of Food, GMO Foods, Toxin Exposure

GM Soy: Invisible Ingredient ‘Poisoning’ Children

Submitted by on May 20, 2011 – 10:52 pm8 Comments

People in Paraguay and other parts of South America are reporting swift illnesses and deaths, especially among children, after exposure to chemical sprays over nearby GM crops. These aren’t isolated cases, many farmers and townspeople are reporting disturbing symptoms after encountering the “mosquitoes,” what they call the sprayer trucks.

Most of the crops in Paraguay are GM and require (and withstand) heavy dousing with agrochemicals. Rules dictate that farmers leave plenty of space between fields and habitation and never spray on hot or windy days. The sickness and death cases indicate that rules are bent and broken. Farmers are also reportedly using banned, dangerous chemical combinations.

There is also growing concern over ingesting the heavily sprayed soy, also for it’s GM components. Many South Americans are aware of the risk when consuming meats and dairy from animals fed with GM and chemical diets.

The increasing growth of this “green gold” as many South American farmers call it, also causes mass displacement, like with the Guarani people. A bettered economy is the platform used to rationalize this devastating practice.

Even though doctors are clearly demonstrating the link between spraying and their patients who become ill and die from intoxication, there seems to be no accountability and recourse. One initiative will seek to encourage better growth methods and one organization seeks to counsel people of the effected parts about environmental law so that they have a fighting chance.

~Health Freedoms

The home of Petrona Villasboa is surrounded by genetically modified (GM) soy fields. The golden crop looks like a bumper harvest but for her it is a symbol of death.

“Soy destroys people’s lives,” she says. “It is a poison. It is no way to live. Soy is deadly to us”.

Sitting outside her painted green shack in rural Paraguay, the mother of eight describes the day in January 2003 when her 11-year-old son Silvino Talavera came home from cycling to the shops.

“I was washing clothes down by the river and he came to tell me he had been sprayed by one of the mosquitoes (the spraying machines behind a tractor),” she says.

“He smelt so bad that he took his clothes off and jumped straight in the water.”

The busy mum did not think much more about it. For people living around GM soy fields spraying with chemicals is a common occurrence.

But later that day the whole family was ill after eating the food that was carried through the heavily-sprayed fields.

Petrona rushed her youngest child to hospital and by the time she was back Silvino was in bed rigid with pain.

Now in a blind panic, she begged local farmers to take her to hospital.

“He was violently sick, he said mummy, my bones ache, his skin went black,” she says.

By the time they arrived in the city Silvino was paralysed, all the doctors could do was administer pain killers, while his mother wiped the foam from his mouth. In a few hours he was dead.

To the family it was clear this horrific death was caused by chemical intoxication but in their grief no autopsy was ever carried out. It was only after years of campaigning that Petrona managed to get the case to court. Eventually two local farmers were convicted of causing the death, though it is unclear whether they have ever been sent to prison.

Like many court cases in Paraguay there are serious unanswered questions. But Petrona is sure of one thing, that her son’s death was caused by GM soy and we should listen to her because we are eating it.

Daily Telegraph investigations have found that every single supermarket in Britain stocks meat and dairy from animals fed GM soy. Leading brands including Cadbury, Unilever and Dairycrest, also use products from livestock fed GM.

In fact the new technology is so widespread that it is likely at least one item of food you eat today will have come from an animal fed GM soy, whether it was the milk on your cereal or the bacon in your sandwich.

But what effect is our growing reliance on soy having on the countries supplying Britain with this ‘invisible ingredient’?

Paraguay, a landlocked country in the heart of South America, is on the front line of the new craze for growing ‘green gold’.

In many ways it is the perfect place to grow unsustainable soy. Ruled by despotic dictators for centuries, the country is famous for being a hot bed of drug smugglers, Nazi war criminals and even al-Qaeda. Even now, with a new democratically government in place, corruption is rife and regulations to protect the people are lax to say the least.

** In the last year the amount of land planted with soy has grown to a record 2.6 million hectares, most of which is GM, leading to claims of deforestation, violent land disputes and the ‘poisoning’ of local communities.

Already it is estimated that 90 per cent of the Atlantic Rainforest in Paraguay has been lost to make way for crops, taking with it thousands of unique plants species, hundreds of rare birds and endangered animals like the jaguar.

** There is evidence that soy production is now moving into the vast ‘Gran Chaco’ in the north of the country, the home of some of the last uncontracted tribes on Earth. The Natural History Museum are currently planning an expedition to the area in the hope of finding hundreds of undiscovered species before it is too late.

Its not just animals that suffer, the forests were also home to humans. Groups of Guarani people claim they have been driven from their land by the soy farmers. They can be seen camping in pathetic tarpaulin shacks in the town squares or on the road side. ‘Campesinos’, the small farmers who have traditionally worked the land, also claim they have been displaced. Since the first soy boom of 1990 it is estimated 100,000 farmers in Paraguay have been forced to migrate to urban slums. Like the ‘wild west’, as soy production moves into new areas there have been violent clashes between land owners and peasants occupying the land. Many of the ‘invaders’ are from Brazil or the even more alien Mennonites, a religious sect from Germany. Amnesty International say fights over land has led to several deaths, thousands of arrests and hundreds of injuries. In some areas there are reportedly armed guards protecting the soy fields 24 hours a day.

Those peasants who have clung to their land claim, like Petrona, that they are being “poisoned” by the ‘mosquitoes’. Most of the crop in Paraguay is GM and requires spraying with agrochemicals. Just as in the UK, farmers are expected to follow certain regulations when spraying fields such as leaving a space between homes or school playgrounds. ‘Live’ barriers of trees should be planted to protect communities and spraying is not allowed in strong winds or hot conditions.

However growing evidence of contamination, poisonings and even deaths suggest the rules are not being followed.

Farmers are also reported to be using compounds that are outlawed in Europe such as the 2,4-D or combinations of chemicals that could be dangerous.

Dr Stela Benítez, a paediatrician at Asuncion University, carried out a study in 2006 summarised in a respected American paediatrics journal, that found women living within 1km of sprayed fields were twice as likely to have a child with deformities.

She is quite certain that there is a risk and the regulations should be applied when spraying close to people’s homes, after all there are rules in Europe, so why not protect people in poorer countries?

“I am worried about a lack of control in an industry that does not apply the principle of protection over all our children,” she says.

The flouting of the law seems to be the main problem in a tour of Paraguay with Friends of the Earth to meet some of the victims of pesticides spraying.

The most recent case happened this January in the rolling hills of Colonia Yeruti, where a few families plant maize amid the growing fields of soy. Isabella Portillo, 26, describes how both her husband Reuben Caceras, 28, and her 2-year-old son Diego became sick after the fields were sprayed with a heavy dose of chemicals. The baby survived but she says her husband died of “intoxication” a few days later. “It is hard without him,” she says. “I feel completely alone.”

In Itakyru a whole community was affected when poisons “rained from the sky” and Guarani women and children were rushed to hospital. The chief says Giralda Gauto Vera, 18, and her daughter Giseli, 18 months, were in hospital for four days after the planes came. Later the authorities confirm that aerial spraying should not even be allowed in an area dotted with the dwellings of indigenous people.

Dr Angie Duarte, who has treated dozens of patients at the public hospital in Curuguaty for what she believes is “intoxication”, admits that many of the worse affected communities are already suffering from malnutrition, immune deficiency and perhaps even using dangerous chemicals themselves on crops.

But isn’t that all the more reason to ensure they are protected?

“How much is it costing to get this so wrong?” she asks. “I fear this will become a problem for the future because more people are getting sick and it impacts on health system. It is in everyone’s interests to act.”

Soy has certainly been in Paraguay’s economic interest over the last year, driving unprecedented growth of 14.5 per cent, ahead of even China.

Sweeping his hand across the shimmering fields, Breno Batista Bianchi is confident that it is soy farmers like him that the country has to thank.

Using new machinery and GM, he is reporting record yields while using less pesticides and water

Of course there are some problems with ‘super weeds’, that build up resistance to chemicals, and outbreaks of disease, but these can easily be solved.

“They will invent new seeds, new chemicals,” he says.

But this blind faith in progress is not shared by everyone.

Paraguay might be providing the soil, water and labour but a tiny percentage of the population see the profits. Soy is not even taxed and most of it leaves South America labelled as ‘Brazilian’ as shipments are mixed in together at the sea ports.

Oskar Rivas, the Environment Minister in a new socialist government, says the growth of soy must not be at the expense of the people.

“It is false development. Who foots the bill? The countryside, the people and the ecosystems and who keeps the profit? The corporations.”

Sr Rivas said it is up to the British consumer to demand change.

While he accepts it is too late to stop GM being grown in Paraguay, he insists more non-GM could be grown, just as in Brazil where whole states have insisted on a more sustainable system, or at least a more sustainable crop.

“You have the right to demand cheap milk and meat but you also have the right to demand milk and meat from environmentally sound sources,” he adds.

New initiatives such as the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTSS), backed by WWF, hope to encourage this sort of production by producing a new label for soy, including GM soy, produced in a sustainable way. Already it has been taken up by major supermarkets in the UK including Waitrose, Asda, M&S and Sainsbury’s although many environmental groups are against a scheme that endorses GM.

Sitting in his new office complex, that is currently been dug up to make an organic garden, Sr Rivas sketches out his vision for a country that uses some of the best growing conditions in the world to produce healthy sustainable food.

Already Friends of the Earth International are working with local charity Sobrevivencia to teach communities environmental law so they can fight back when communities are sprayed and organic farming techniques so they can make their own food.

“At the moment we all lose out,” says the minister. “With a different structural process we could all win.”

By Louise Gray, Environment Correspondent

Source:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/8391748/GM-soy-The-invisible-ingredient-poisoning-children.html

 

8 Comments »

  • Bill Smith says:

    If what Monsanto is doing with GM crops was being done by a foreign government it would be considered bio-terrorism!

    We must all work hard to make it stop or accept our own death from it!

    So, take a stand or die. It is your choice.

  • deenie says:

    GM crops are a disaster in every way. They are an essential part of the population reduction agenda. The US government since the early 90′s has been a promoter of GM crops which continues to this day. Now we have genetically modified animals as well. Every independent test/study has shown these genetically modified organism to cause tumors, sterility, allergies, etc. We cannot sit idly by while this assault on the human race is going on “in our face.”

  • marsette smith says:

    We already know about the ill effects of GM soy. The question is, what is being DONE about it????? Monsanto was just granted legal permission to produce GM sugarbeets here in the U.S. Why is no one stopping them?

  • D G says:

    Why is nobody stopping this? Monsanto employees become Congressmen and women, or Senators. They introduce bills and do inside lobbying to get these bills that are very favorable to Monsanto & other big ag growers.
    Just try to find out where the former employees are. The women married to Monsanto executives don’t use their married names. It’s a very
    exclusive club and they do not necessarily do anything to make the news
    or stand out from the crowd of legislators. Only finding out who they
    are, starting to expose them and finding out the backgrounds of new
    politicians running for office and exposing them will be effective in
    getting rid of these evil people. Since they are so sure this is all
    “safe” let them go stand in the fields as they are being sprayed with
    their whole families and show us.

  • Ravi says:

    clearly this is intentional genocide – in the “old” days while there was still forest to scare them deeper into, that was the tactic – now the land-grabbers want ALL the land and the indigenous people are simply in the way –

    in the name of money, profit – you may kill, rape, destroy – it’s the ongoing legacy of disconnected humanity – unbridled corporate capitalism, greed and stupidity.

    one can only take solace in the fact that they too, the ones perpetrating these atrocities, will eventually die with the rest of us.

  • PhillipBbrooks says:

    The governments, US and foriegn, and big Agriculutural growers have always found a way to exploite the uneducated, poor and underdeveloped countries in the name of progresss and profit. It matters little who
    who suffer and die due to their disregard for the enviroment,animal and human life. How utterly shamless can beings be to other less fortunates.

    When will we all get it that we are all ONE, made from the same elements.

  • Suzanne Favreau says:

    I am not in favor of GM food. However, the title of this article is misleading. It’s what they’re spraying on the crops that’s causing the immediate problems in Paraguay, right? I do understand that eating the GM soybeans or animals fed with GM grain both of which are sprayed with massive doses of weed killer is also harmful, but I think it’s very important to stick to the facts if we want to halt the production of GM crops. There are two issues here, the GM crops and the toxic and often illegal spraying. It seems to me that the primary effort in Paraguay should be to put an end to the spraying. This is really a human rights issue. Anybody have a suggestion on how we can help to do this?

  • This can be stopped on a state level by creating voter awareness to remove one by one every state officials who acts as power broker for Monsanto. It is a simple task but it takes money to pay for the phone call to every voters home in a district. Automated messaging is the cheapest and most effective form of communication to the public. Robo calls irritate legislators more then the household who answers the phone. This is what I do for a living and we have succeeded in squashing hundreds of self serving agendas since 1996. I am not plugging my personal business because any robo calling company can do the job. All it takes is an organization who has enough donated funds to pay for the calls.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.