Rogue USDA Hands It All to Monsanto – GM Grass
When we say Kentucky bluegrass is about to spread like wildfire, we’re not talking about a resurging musical trend. USDA quietly hands Monsanto all unregulated rights to grow genetically modified Kentucky bluegrass.
A lot of major news happens when we are celebrating and resting up over the holidays. Witness the sneak attack on all supplements and now the Monsanto grass-crashing.
See all the details below and how the USDA’s justification defies basic logic. This rogue agency is allowing a rogue corporation to call the shots and spread a rogue grass that will have untold impact on human health, liabilities, and the environment.
~Health Freedoms
Genetic Modification Wins: Rogue USDA Hands It All to Monsanto
Get ready for Monsanto’s poisonous GM plants to be released without any regulation. The USDA is abdicating its role in controlling many of these plants.
Just as the truth of genetically engineered crops have started to leak out to the general public, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has pulled off a carefully-designed plot to give the entire ballgame to Monsanto. They have handed Monsanto the ability to sell their Roundup Ready grass seed, and have done it in a manner that will allow them to sell nearly every other GM product they devise with absolutely no limitations.
This has been accomplished by a clever and clandestine plan, one that initially appeared to support serious restrictions on genetically modified plants—but, as demonstrated by a sneaky late-Friday declaration, was actually designed to give Monsanto virtually everything.
Late last Friday—when news tends to take a holiday—the USDA quietly issued a press release stating that they will not regulate Monsanto’s Roundup Ready Scotts Kentucky Bluegrass.(1) By not regulating it, they are allowing it to be sold without any regulation of any sort.
Monsanto will be able to sell its glyphosate-resistant grass seeds at will. You can expect to see corporate entities, like golf courses, plant those seeds and then madly spray soil-sterilizing glyphosate everywhere.
Then, as their GM seeds start to cross-breed with yours, you can expect Monsanto to demand that you pay them for infringing on their patents. Just as farmers, whose crops have been adulterated by Monsanto’s seed pollen, are forced to pay Monsanto for growing those adulterated crops, there is no reason to believe that homeowners should expect to be exempt from Monsanto’s rapaciousness.
USDA Decides Not to Regulate
What is both remarkable and frightening is that the USDA did not approve Monsanto’s grass. Instead, their division, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), stated:
APHIS has confirmed that organisms used in generating Scotts’ variety of GE Kentucky bluegrass arenot considered to be plant pests, and Scotts did not use a plant pest to genetically engineer the Kentucky bluegrass. Moreover, the glyphosate tolerance is caused by a single gene insertion, which does not create a new species of Kentucky bluegrass. In addition, APHIS has no reason to believe that the GE Kentucky bluegrass itself is a plant pest. Accordingly, the Scotts GE bluegrass variety is not a regulated article under APHIS’ biotechnology regulations… [Emphases mine.]
In a nutshell, the USDA says:
- If a plant pest is not used in the manufacture of a genetically-engineered crop, or
- A single gene insertion modified the organism, or
- The new organism is not believed to be a direct plant pest itself, then
- APHIS (the USDA) does not have the authority to regulate it.
How We Got to This Point
Doug Gurian-Sherman is a senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists’ Food and Environment Program. In a recent interview with Mother Jones magazine’s Tom Philpott(1), he said that back in the ’50s, the Plant Pest Act gave the USDA authority to restrict the introduction of organisms that might harm plants. According to Gurion-Sherman:
The Plant Pest Act was always just a regulatory hook to give the USDA authority to regulate engineered crops. Everyone—the industry, industry watchdogs, the USDA—always knew it was a fiction.
The genetic engineering industry accepted it, because according to Gurion-Sherman, they knew it was little more than:
…a fig leaf. They could say that their crops are regulated and have been deemed ‘safe’ by the USDA.
They also knew that, once the fiction of a GM plant being a direct pest was stripped, they would be left virtually unregulated.
But another regulation was tossed into the works in 2000. The Plant Protection Act extended the Plant Pest Act to include a noxious weed status, meaning that any plant that threatens to go wild and become a dangerous weed could be controlled by the USDA. This, though, just slowed the deregulation down a bit.
The Scotts corporation recently sent a letter to the Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack stating:
Because Kentucky bluegrass itself is not a plant pest, no plant pest components will be involved in the transformation, and the native plant genomes that will be used are fully classified, there is no scientifically valid basis for concluding that transgenic Kentucky bluegrass is or will become a plant pest within the meaning of the Plant Protection Act.(3)
As Gurion-Sherman told Mother Jones:
If the companies don’t use plant pests [in development of GMOs], then the USDA ostensibly doesn’t have a legal hook to regulate the crops.
On the first of July, the USDA sent a letter to Scotts. They capitulated completely to the Scotts letter’s claim:
Because no plant pests, unclassified organisms, or organisms whose classification is unknown were used to genetically engineer this variety of GE Kentucky bluegrass, APHIS has no reason to believe it is a plant pest and therefore does not consider the Kentucky bluegrass described in the letter dated September 13, 2010 to be regulated un 7 CFR part 340 and is not subject to the plant pest provisions of the PPA [Plant Pest Act].(4)
USDA, Rogue Agency
The USDA could easily have declared genetically modified Kentucky bluegrass to be a noxious weed. The Center for Food Safety did, in fact, request that they do so. It would have been a perfectly logical step to take. Grasses of all sorts—and Kentucky bluegrass is no exception—have light and easily dispersed pollen. Thus, the likelihood of polluting existing strains is very high—in fact, it’s virtually certain. Like most other grasses, Kentucky bluegrass grows and spreads rapidly. There is already an example of a genetically engineered grass becoming a noxious weed: Roundup Ready bentgrass is already a scourge in Oregon.
And the USDA admits it!
In a document released on Friday, the same day that they refused to regulate GM Kentucky bluegrass, the USDA stated:
The analysis concludes that Kentucky bluegrass species P. pratensis (including GE and non-GE) can be considered for regulation as a Federally listed noxious weed.(5)
Their analysis even goes on to document that non-GM Kentucky bluegrass has already proven to be a noxious weed.
A court had ordered the USDA to complete its environmental impact study on GM beets, but the USDA ignored the order and went ahead with their approval. Now, after thumbing its notse at the courts, the USDA has given Monsanto free rein to poison the soil and people with its GM seeds.
This is a statement included in the USDA’s document explaining why they are not going to regulate GM Kentucky bluegrass as a noxious weed! They used the sleight-of-hand declaration that the GM version is “essentially the same” as the non-GM version.
In other words, their logic reads like this:
- Non-GM Kentucky bluegrass is a noxious weed.
X is black. - GM Kentucky bluegrass is essentially the same as non-GM Kentucky bluegrass.
Y is just like X. - Therefore, GM Kentucky bluegrass is not a noxious weed.
Therefore Y is white
Only a rogue agency would presume to use logic that runs like that! It’s obvious that the USDA set out to loose genetically-engineered crops on the world.
So, you can get ready for even more toxic poisons to be used against the coming plague of glyphosate-resistant plants that have gone wild. You can also anticipate that Monsanto will follow through on its plan to make every person in the world pay them tribute.
Even when farmers have actively tried to prevent it, Monsanto has been declaring that any farm plant with their toxic genes belong to them. When you don’t find their plants quickly enough to weed them out, expect a bill demanding payment.
After all, when you rule the world, you can exact whatever tribute you want.
by Heidi Stevenson
Source:
http://www.gaia-health.com/articles451/000489-gm-wins-usda-monsanto.shtml
3,561,596 members
12,429,752 petition signatures
$19,571,785,510 diverted from Big Pharma


Isn’t Pelosi’s husband one of Monsanto’s executives?
So…this may spell the beginning of the end for good raw milk- right? What else would the cows eat? Our DNA is about to change.
Can anyone get Vendetta, Anonymous Hackers to bring Monsanto down?!!!!
Kindly advise how we can protest this harmful decision!!
has anyone got an online petition going on all this? Monsanto and all their gm garbage may be killing us and no one knows for sure or cares
Can this article go on http://www.thepetitionsite.com ??
PLEASE PROVIDE US AN ACTION ITEM FOR THIS!
It is pretty evident that MONSANTO is the ANTI-CHRIST>>>>>>>>
OUT TO POISON THE PLANET……NOT JUST THE USA
In some cities noxious weeds are illegal and a property owner must have them removed or be subject to fines. This is where Monsanto aka USDA can enforce their agenda through laws. Where are the ever powerful environmental lobby groups hiding that Monsanto is getting it on globally like this? Do we need Al Gore to promote this one to get the world’s attention? Oh, can’t he is just as bad as Clinton, Bush and Obama in regard to assisting Monsanto.
The feeling of helplessness looms so large. And remember these Monsanto folks are US Citizens…plotting [in their own way] against other citizens. How do they sleep at night? War is obvious. Power and money for the few and suffering for the many. THIS is under the radar and more evil then war since it is to control life itself. What will it take to stop this degradation of humanity? What?
Monsanto is evil incarnate. YES Anonymous go get em!
I agree with almost everyone here. Why is there always so much information on this site but never any petition to sign to protest the actions? The author of the article above should be responsible enough not to just throw out news but also to be proactive about it as well. What is the point otherwise?
Is this like Obama demanding a debt limit to counter the debt default????
Sounds suspiciously double speak to me. We can regulate noxous weeds but this is not a noxious weed but belongs to a genus that is considered a noxious weed and actually they both are noxious weeds….
Makes perfect sense to me. 1984 is alive and well in the good ole USA. Don’t you want to slap them when they speak like that. Talking about adding insult to injury…
Hi
There is a petition on the petition web site, there are also many groups out there fighting this. ” millions against monsanto ” have groups all over the states that need members.
There is a march and a rally in Oct …. so please spread the word and MARK OCTOBER 16th on your calendar and make your voice heard … WE have to stand up and STOP this MADDNESS. Google or visit our web site for links and actions http://www.australianswantgmfreefood.net.au
This affects everyone …. and this poison is spreading !
Kris Heather
These creatures know no bounds in their greed!!
☹=============================
Fluoride in the water, mercury in the vaccines and GMO stuff all contribute to the creation of a sick, dumb and compliant population.
➤ http://globalistagenda.org/health.htm
Why is everyone asking ‘someone else’ to ‘do something’ about Monsanto?
I guess that’s why this country is in such bad shape. No body wants to step up to the plate and take a swing. Just keep being scared birds with your heads in the sand and watch your country go into the crapper.
I wonder where all the people in Monsanto will get their food from when their biological warfare seeds take over the world.
By the way, online petitions are not legal or valid and carry no weight. Petitions have to be on paper and have real signatures attached. I wonder why there are no petitions being ‘mailed’ from town to town and getting sent to our representatives. Somebody would have to pay for all the postage. Who’s going to do that?
Does anyone know the term Class Action Lawsuit?