Home » Disease Conditions, Medical Discoveries, Medical Maiming, MMS, Toxin Exposure

Avoid Root Canals Like The Plague

Submitted by on July 30, 2011 – 12:24 am23 Comments

Root canals are almost as common as fillings now; about 60 million are performed every year. “Root canals are almost ALWAYS infected and will nearly always be dripping bacteria into your bloodstream forever. ”

Many healthy people can make informed decisions about things like mercury, HFCS, junk food and more. But very few know about the toxic anaerobic life lurking right in their root canals. Biting down on the root canal tooth can further inject a stream of myriad endlessly reproducing bacteria into the system.

The Toxic Element Research Foundation is investigating further and proposing that a lot of diseases actually come the toxic duo of heavy metals meshed with the bacterial stream. This is further evidenced when people heal  and experience increased immunity after having the root canals removed.

Just as many dentists risk losing their licenses for opposing silver (mercury) fillings which contain about 50 percent mercury, dentists run the same risk if they divulge the truth about root canals.

Please read further to find out whose fighting to tell the truth and what you can do if you’ve had a root canal.

MMS is an excellent dental bacteria destroyer – use it on your toothbrush or for gargling to further reduce dental bacterial toxicity and improve oral, immune and heart health.

~Health Freedoms


For Yourself and Your Children: Avoid Root Canals Like The Plague

Most dentists consider root canals an advance in dentistry –a superior alternative to removal of a seriously compromised tooth. However a growing number of physicians, including dentists, believe that root canals can be the cause of, or at least contribute to, a long list of illnesses and degenerative diseases.

Dr. Richard Hansen, D.M.D., Director of the Center for Advanced Dentistry in Fullerton, California says that dentists “need to stop grinding down a kid’s perfectly good tooth with a small cavity to put in a big silver filling.”

Hal A. Huggins DDS, MS, is the world’s most controversial dentist because of his stand on trying to convince dentistry to stop the use of mercury in fillings. In the interview below he talks about a number of diseases and conditions that may be brought on by bacteria from root canals.

 

Root canals are almost ALWAYS infected and will nearly always be dripping bacteria into your bloodstream forever. Most dentists likely won’t agree with this and will tell you that you couldn’t possibly get sick from the bacteria at your root base. If you have an honest dentist, they will tell you that it is impossible to completely sterilize the root of your tooth. If the root can’t be sterilized, then what is to stop bacteria from reproducing. And there is a good blood supply to the root of every tooth, so where is the infection supposed to go if it can’t come out the cavity? It will go into your jawbone or your bloodstream.

Root canals have become ubiquitous — almost 60 million are performed each year. “You need a root canal” is now almost as common as hearing you need a filling. And, it is not lost on the dental profession that people do not want to lose their teeth. It is the only treatment protocol available to retain a tooth that is diseased. Yet, just how safe are root canals? And what is the science behind their being a non–toxic alternative to tooth extractions?

These questions are not new, nor are the findings. Indeed, Dr. Weston Price and Mayo’s Clinic of 1910 to 1920 described finding bacterial growth in root canals that could be transferred into animals and create the same diseases the donor human had in from 80 to 100 percent of the animals. Heart disease, in particular, could be transferred 100 percent of the time. His research has since been suppressed by the various Dental Associations in the United States.

The Toxic Element Research Foundation (TERF), using state of the art DNA testing technology, identified multiple pathological bacteria found within root canal teeth, the bone adjacent to the teeth, and even more in extraction sites where healing has not taken place. This non–healing occurs in greater than 99 percent of wisdom tooth extraction sites. Additionally, large defects of non-healing are often found upon surgical exploration into the bone – about the size of the original wisdom tooth. Other sites leave what are called “cavitations” as well.

Dr. Weston Price’s death-bed wish was for someone to pick up his hard earned baton and make this information available to the public. The Toxic Element Research Foundation has done just that, using present days advanced testing techniques to confirm Prices’ research.

The question now becomes: What will patients, government agencies and the dental profession do about it?

TERF, a non-profit research foundation, is dedicated to stimulating interest in the research community as well as informing the public to become aware of potential problems associated with dental materials and procedures. Informed consent of potential problems makes for better informed decisions by the patient especially where health is at risk.

Root Canals
For years, comedians have poked fun at root canals and the pain associated with the procedure. Little did they know that the pain was not short lived. As far back 1908, microbiology researchers from Mayo’s Clinic and from the dental association at the time found that bacteria and their toxins from root canals could enter the blood stream and travel to any point in the body, and generate disease to that tissue or organ. The dental association, concerned about liability issues, insisted that the nerve chamber in the center of the tooth could be effectively sterilized, and that the body would accept a root canal tooth as — not a “dead tooth” as it was previously called — but a “non-vital” tooth – a new and much more acceptable term for a root canal. Incidentally, non– vital means dead.

Incidentally, non–vital means dead

One of the most decorated dental researchers of all times, Dr. Weston Price, was ridiculed by his dental leaders, and, even 60 years after his death, dental leaders still maintain his research is not valid. Why? Fear. For disclosing the truth about the toxicity from root canals would heap tremendous liability upon the dental association as well as individual dentists. It would also ruin a very lucrative practice in dentistry. The association, even today as the American Dental Association (ADA), insists that they have proved Mayo’s and Dr. Price to be wrong. There is no research to support this claim, and none can be produced. Yet dentists are continually threatened with license revocation if they expose the truth about root canals or even suggest they may be dangerous.

Just as they have seen many colleagues lose their licenses for exposing the toxicity of mercury in so–called “silver” fillings, which actually contain 50 percent mercury, dentists fear for loss of their income source if they mention root canals as a source of disease.

Today, there are many diseases termed, “of unknown etiology,” which means, ”we have not the first clue where they are coming from.” Many health oriented dentists and physicians are beginning to recognize that these incurable, non–responsive diseases are showing improvements by techniques involving removal of root canal teeth and fortifying the patient’s immune system. Threats, law suits and professional humiliation have been used against dentists who stand up for their patients, and against the ADA.

How big is the problem of root canals? In 1990, the ADA set a goal (quota) of dentists performing 30 million root canals per year in the US by the year 2000. Dentistry accomplished this by 1999. Now the bar has been raised to 60 million root canals per year.

Ask your friends. How many have root canals? How many of those friends are taking medications for some vague disease on a daily basis? Of those people treated for non–responsive diseases, perhaps as many as 90 percent have root canals. Research accumulated by TERF, based on treatment of thousands of people, suggest this is the case.

For example, Dr. Josef Issels of Germany found that in his 40 years of treating “terminal” cancer patients, 97 percent of his cancer patients had root canals. He would not initiate his successful treatments until all root canals had been removed.

TERF believes it is no coincidence that in the US root canals have been found to abound in people with Multiple sclerosis, Lou Gehrig’s disease, Lupus, leukemia, diabetes, arthritis, and a host of other autoimmune diseases. Reversal of these diseases, as shown by improvements in physical conditions as well as positive changes in blood chemistries, occur after the removal of dental toxic challenges (mercury, nickel, aluminum, root canals and cavitations) in conjunction with stimulation to the immune systems of these people.

Thousands of lives are challenged daily by the placement of root canals, and when these patient’s genetic weak links break, they and their families are doomed to financial and health losses that destroy their ability to work, play, raise families and enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It is believed by TERF that many of these diseases do not have to happen.

The reason is simple. Extremely toxic anaerobic bacteria have been found and identified in and around root canals.

All reasonably informed citizens of the US understand that alcohol and tobacco potentially create health hazards. They have a choice. Citizens are not informed of the multiple disease producing bacteria living in their root canals. TERF is convinced that if people were informed of the hazards created by “anaerobic” bacteria living in the periodontal ligament surrounding these root canal teeth, they could at least make an informed choice about whether or not to risk this potentially life altering procedure.

These anaerobic bacteria have now been identified by DNA analysis of the teeth, blood adjacent to the root canal teeth, and cavitations,” or the bone defects left behind by tooth removal in which the contaminated periodontal ligament is left in place. These patients have been informed by their fear–laden, but trusted dentist, that root canals are perfectly safe. They are told that root canal teeth are “sterile.”

This simply is not true.

A protective barrier is formed around many root canal teeth that allow nutrients from the blood to enter, but prevent access of antibiotics and white blood cells of the immune system to try to heal the areas. As toxins seep out into the blood stream when the owner of the root canal bites down on food, toxins are forced into the blood with access to every location in the body that might have a weak spot. “Sterilizing the tooth” just does not happen. Yes, a column of air in the pulp chamber is cleaned, but the real problem is in the periodontal ligament that surrounds the tooth. That is the incubator in which billions of bacteria can breed.

Dr. Weston Price — head of research for the dental association for 14 years in the 1920s and 30s, published the results of 1000 extracted teeth in which canal sterilization was done in the dental research laboratory. Researchers in the laboratory used not just the routine sterilizing chemicals, but extremely potent sterilizing agents (more toxic than could possibly be used in the mouth) and in a highly controlled sterile environment. Their microbiology specialists found that 97 percent were cultured to find re–contamination within 48 hours. In other words, they were still there.

Many of the bacteria found were quite pathological. Today’s DNA research has found not only the ones that Dr. Price discovered in the ’20s but many more that have the ability to create disease.

Where did these pathogens (bacteria that can cause disease) come from? They were in the dentin tubules – over three miles of tiny tubes per tooth that constitute the mid section of the tooth called the dentin. This is located right below the enamel, and adjacent to the pulp chamber. Where do these bacteria go in real life? They travel down the tubules to the periodontal ligament which is the attachment between tooth and bone. An area impossible to sterilize, and where neither antibiotics nor white blood cells of the immune system can reach this protected location. Every time a person bites down — as in chewing — some of these bacteria — or worse yet, their toxins, are squirted into the body’s lymphatic drainage system. From here they go to the blood stream. From there — everywhere.

Why should the public be concerned? With millions of root canals out there, and thousands having been told they need one every month, the potential for problems is past epidemic almost to the endemic stage. Again, it must be pointed out, those people are not informed about the hazard they are about to have inflicted on themselves. In most cases, neither is the dentist.

Everyone who receives a root canal has an incubator in those dentinal tubules that is growing anaerobic bacteria that can create whatever disease their genetic weak link would prefer. This is no longer a one microbe, one disease, one drug to cure, world. Multiple bacteria families, joining hands with toxic metals like mercury and nickel, now endeavor to create new diseases unfamiliar a hundred years ago.

It is contended that dentists “sterilize” the dead tooth. And that is true, they do. However, no matter what the pulp chamber is embalmed with (a wax cone called gutta percha is generally placed into the canal), the tooth is still dead. The body does not accept dead structures as safe. In fact, it launches an autoimmune response against the dead tooth. This is the origin of many autoimmune diseases, compounded by the presence of pathological bacteria and their toxins.

What about these anaerobic bacteria? The ones that live in the absence of oxygen? Who are they, and in which patients are they found?

TERF spokesperson, Dr. Huggins states: “Our observations over the past 40 years suggest that the old theory of one microbe — like Strep pneumonia — gives one disease, like pneumonia, that is cured by one drug – penicillin, is being replaced by group warfare. Toxic dental metals are known to alter the integrity of he cell membrane, called cell membrane permeability. Reduction of quality allows weaker bacteria to invade the cells, but once inside the membrane, even a weak bacterium and cause lethal results to the cell.

“Bacterial invasion is not consistent. If we identify the bacteria of several root canals in a person with Multiple sclerosis (MS) or Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS) with DNA technology, we do not find the identical bacteria in each dead tooth.

“For instance, in root canals or cavitations in people with MS, a bacterium, Enterobacter was found. It was also found in ALS and Alzheimer patients (AD). Is there a similarity, since they are all neurological diseases? Enterobacter is noted for involvement in endocarditis (inflammation around the heart), bone infections — “can cause disease in virtually any body compartment;” and “cause considerable mortality and morbidity rates. Exposure to one type of Enterobacter can result in neurological disorders. They do not usually cause immediate death.”

TERF believes these types of finding warrant further investigation.

In the study that is the subject of this news release, TERF found that by looking at DNA reports of 43 root canal samples, a total of 42 different species of anaerobic bacteria were found out of a potential of 85 choices. The number of different microbes ranged from 11 to 40 in individual tooth tests. In cavitations, which are unhealed bone defects, primarily where wisdom teeth have been extracted, from 118 samples, 67 different bacteria were identified. Individual tests ranged from 19 to 53 per single sample. Again, out of a potential of 85 tested.

Staphlococcus aureus, usually reserved for hospital outbreaks, are not the most common, being in less that 23 percent of the MS, ALS, and AD samples studied, none the less can be part of the team destruction process. Aureus is noted to kill white blood cells of the immune system. Common denominator? Is it proper to have a reservoir of them with their toxins readily available for distribution each time a person bites down? The way the system operates, biting down on a root canal tooth can squirt toxins out into the system, but antibiotics and white blood cells cannot get in through the combination calcium – blood clot barrier provided by the body’s reaction to certain bacteria.

Looking briefly at the bacteria and their published toxicity for connections to these people, these bacteria became suspect: In Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Lou Gehrig’s disease, or ALS).

Evaluating 29 samples:

  • Veillonella parvula 58 percent – pathology associated with heart disease and destruction of the Central Nervous System.
  • Candida albicans – 65 percent – as it changes from yeast to the fungal state, it becomes invasive, causing small holes to occur in the intestinal tract resulting in “leaky gut syndrome”. Also increases porphyrin excretion in urine leading to reduced ATP and heme formation, thus reducing overall energy to cells of the nervous system.
  • Capnocytophaga ochracea – 58 percent – can cause frontal lobe brain abscesses – associated with dental infections and diseases of the Central Nervous System
  • Porphyromas gingivalis – 75 percent– alters the integrity of endothelium of blood vessels. Enhances atherosclerosis.
  • Gemella morbillorum – 68 percent – noted for endovascular infections and meningitis.

Evaluation of 40 Multiple sclerosis samples in which 81 separate microbes were identified, seven are reported here.

Although not defined as a neurologic disease, draining sinuses are common among MS patients with root canals, so Actinomyces was included.

  • Actinomyces naeslundii – 35 percent – associated with draining sinuses (generally clear up within a week of root canals and cavitation treatment)
  • Candida albicans – 62 percent – described in ALS section.
  • Capnocytophaga ochracea – 42 percent– frontal lobe brain abscesses of dental origin – microbe thought to originate in dental decay.
  • Gemella morbillorum – 57 percent– associated with meningitis.
  • Neisseria meningitides – 7 percent– associated with seizures.
  • Escherichia coli – 12 percent- and Staph aureus – seven percent are both capable of increasing porphyrins, which will cause less ATP to be available to neural tissues.
  • Streptococcus intermedius – 27 percent – Cervical spinal cord abscesses – associated with high mortality and neurologic morbidity.

TERF’s spokesperson, Dr. Hal Huggins, has researched toxicity of dental materials for 40 years. His January presentation for the Toxic Element Research Foundation covered the most influential diagnostic chemistries selected from his base of 200,000 data points.

He found that many victims of autoimmune disease showed improvements in blood chemistries discussed in this TERF presentation that clearly indicate recovery from disease is a possibility when the challenging bacteria are removed with proper protection for the patient.

Millions of people stand to regain their lives, and countless more millions will never have to contract the diseases thought to be related to the combination of dental mercury, nickel, aluminum, root canal and cavitation anaerobic bacteria as they combine forces to destroy the immune system.

This ground breaking data will be made available to research health professionals worldwide who are willing to use the data to find positive solutions to today’s health problems.

Additionally, this information begs the questions:

Should the public be informed about the potential real danger of toxins from root canals and cavitations, regardless of the consequences, financial and otherwise, to the ADA and dentists?

Sources:

http://preventdisease.com/news/11/072711_avoid_root_canals.shtml

http://www.hugginsappliedhealing.com/root-canals-toxic.php

http://blog.easy-immune-health.com/tag/problems-with-root-canals/#axzz1TGBhN5Pv

http://www.cdchealth.com/avoidrootcanals.html

 

Related posts:

  1. Coconut Oil Could Combat Tooth Decay Digested coconut oil is able to attack the bacteria...
  2. Dental Composites for Kids: Even Worse Than Mercury Amalgam? Dental Composites Linked To Behavioral Issues In Children Research...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

23 Comments »

  • Linda St.John says:

    Thank you soooo much…I’ve been going every 6 months to have my root canal checked for healing for two years. One half healed up! Yahoo. the The other is still infected. I asked for more time. My dentist doesn’t know the healing things I do, but humors me. One thing I’ve learned to do body packs and I pack the tooth. (thanks to Dr. Marshall’s radio show…) Now I know why I didn’t want gum surgery. I’ve heard of the dangers or RC’s but didn’t know the details.
    Thanks again. This helps…and inforces my own diligence. Next I have to find a Biocompatible Dentist. I stayed with my mercury filler telling myself it would be okay (denial!!); but now I definately will move on this priority. Thanks again.

  • lydia says:

    So what are patients and dentists to do w/ diseased teeth if root canal is so detrimental to our health? Remove the tooth all together???
    Info is eye opening, but no alternative solution is provided.

  • Lou says:

    “Info is eye opening, but no alternative solution is provided.”

    When one of your limbs is so infected that it is gangrenous you are given a choice you lose your limb or you lose your life.

    Your choice.

    With an infected tooth, ALL root canals are infected, your choice is not so drastic. Keep the infected tooth and risk your health or lose the tooth.

    Believe me you will not long miss a single tooth. I am operating quite well without several of them. I still have and greatly treasure my health.

  • Robin says:

    I totally agree with Lydia….so what is the alternative-
    Leave an infected tooth in the mouth??!!

    I have worked as a dental assistant for 40 years and have seen the pain and suffering and the effect of a rotting tooth in the mouth- as a result of the same bacteria that you talk about.

    Have you ever seen a 6 year old who need DENTURES because their parent didn’t want then to have root canals on primary teeth and the decay spread from tooth to tooth??? That is also what happens when people want to take fluoride out of the water. Not only does the enamel on the child’s teeth not have any added protection against decay but now you say that doing a root canal can be detrimental to your health!!??

    This research lacks many important facts – such as, after the nerve canals have been prepared and the inside of the canal has been cleaned and manually(physically) widened, thus removing infected tissue and bacteria, they are filled with a material called Gutta Precha which along with a sealant called AH26ת(silver free) which when used properly by an endodontist (root canal specialist who has studied an additional year or 2 at university), will seal off the ends of the nerve canal AND the blood supply to the root, thereby preventing the “infection” to spread any further in the blood stream. The human body has a great immune system and in a short time (days) there will be NO residual infection in the blood system and the problem is solved.
    For those who take supplements such as what you are always recommending this healing will be even shorter.

    Lets face it, the alternative is removing the tooth- which will leave the bone (socket) exposed to the bacteria which you are trying to prevent- and then there will be a gap between the teeth which will lead to the unwanted but natural migrating of the teeth which always want to be in contact with one another.
    To solve that problem, Implants have to be done and that is another surgical procedure, which although is not complicated is still invasive.

    So which is better, having a root and and building up your immune system to ward off infection or having a painful infected decaying tooth in your mouth that can really lead to the endocarditis you were talking about , to say nothing of how you are going to chew your food later????!!!
    Respectfully yours,
    Robin Rotfleisch CDA

  • Lou says:

    “The human body has a great immune system and in a short time (days) there will be NO residual infection in the blood system and the problem is solved.”

    No the problem is NOT solved. The human tooth as you know has many miles of tubules. These tubules in application CANNOT be sealed off. The blood supply to the tubules can be stopped. HOWEVER anaerobic life will then proliferate within the tubules. Anaerobic pathogenesis is perhaps the KEY root of disease in the human body. ALL parts of the human body MUST be cleansed by oxygenated blood, directly or indirectly. Anaerobic pathogenesis is the PRIME cause of cancer. Now cancer of the tooth is unknown but these pathogenic bacteria are PROVEN to migrate throughout the human body. Counting on a good immune system to counter them is foolhardy IMO.

    Dead tissue including teeth are to be removed from a healthy human body. This is just common sense.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090727205901.htm

  • deenie says:

    I got two root canals, one on a front tooth and another on a rear molar. The molar bothers me every couple of months, the other never bothers me at all. I did have the silver amalgam removed from the tooth ten years ago. When it starts hurting a bit, I take MMS for a couple days and it heals up and stops hurting. But then, after awhile, I will bite down on something hard and it will make me wince. Using MMS, I am able to keep this tooth around. I am thinking now of just taking MMS for a few weeks and get my immune system in top notch shape, then go in to a dentist and get it taken out. And then keep on taking the MMS for another month or two while the body heals up the cavity where the tooth was at. It will leave a gap, but I think that the molar could be an unnecessary load on the immune system and put my heart at risk.

  • Sky says:

    Robin clearly doesn’t know as much as she thinks she does if she doesn’t know that fluoride only works if applied directly to the teeth. It does not work if swallowed, except to cause skeletal fluorosis. There is also no way to correctly dose it, infants and those who drink a lot of water are exposed to toxic amounts when their drinking water has fluoride. No one should be forced to choose between having a toxic substance they don’t want in their water or spending hundreds of dollars to get rid of it. If people want fluoride in their water, they can add it themselves instead of forcing everyone else to have it too.

    If Robin’s information on fluoride is so wrong, how can anyone trust her information on anything else?

    And obviously the alternative is PULL THE INFECTED TOOTH.

    I just have on question about the article, how can someone who had their wisdom teeth pulled find out if they have issues? It feels healed to me, but it sounds like the problem would be in the bone and impossible to detect just by looking/feeling.

  • Sky says:

    Robin, fluoride only works if applied directly to the teeth. It does not work if swallowed, except to cause skeletal fluorosis. There is also no way to correctly dose it, infants and those who drink a lot of water are exposed to toxic amounts when their drinking water has fluoride. No one should be forced to choose between having a toxic substance they don’t want in their water or spending hundreds of dollars to get rid of it. If people want fluoride in their water, they can add it themselves instead of forcing everyone else to have it too.

    If Robin’s information on fluoride is so wrong, how can anyone trust her information on anything else?

    And obviously the alternative is PULL THE INFECTED TOOTH.

    I just have on question about the article, how can someone who had their wisdom teeth pulled find out if they have issues? It feels healed to me, but it sounds like the problem would be in the bone and impossible to detect just by looking/feeling.

  • Lou says:

    A comic interlude is required about here. Pictured at the beginning of this great article is Steve Martin, here is the skit the picture is taken from.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOtMizMQ6oM

  • Root Canal says:

    I can definitely say I do not enjoy Root Canal’s so I DO avoid them like the plague!

  • Joanne Smith says:

    It does seem logical that all root canals are done on infected teeth. I am not aware of any other reason that root canals might be done. I bet that I have a root canal on most of my upper teeth due to nighttime bruxism. Every so often one of these will ‘flare up’ and my dentist gives me an antibiotic for anaerobic bacteria. Now I am wondering whether there is any connection to the rheumatoid arthritis that they found two years ago when I had a total knee replacement done. My other ‘wondering’ is what would I do without teeth if I would have to remove all these teeth due to the root canals. How does one eat then? Are you also saying that if the tooth is pulled, the infection will be removed from the body? Should every person that gets a tooth pulled require antibiotics for anaerobic bacteria. A third ‘wondering’ I have is about my sister. She had all her upper teeth removed at about age 47…had to have a heart valve replaced at about age 50 because the bacteria lodged in that valve, and then subsequently died of a stroke (smoker).

  • Kirk says:

    My elderly mother suffered from a chronic hip infection that saw her in hospital several times. Finally they removed 2 root canals and she stayed infection free.

  • Linda says:

    I notice that over the years, root canals have become more popular. Used to be, they would drill the cavity and pack it with a temporary antiseptic filling to fix the abcess, then later replace with a permanent composite. Now immediately the root canal is offered as the only alternative to extraction.

    Linda, try using essential oils on your gums around the teeth – works very well – Thieves by Young Living, or a high-quality Rose oil – directly to the gum. Myrrh powder can be applied as a paste. Goldenseal /echinacea tinctures help as well.

  • lea says:

    I think the only other option is to get an implant which many people can’t afford.

  • Darlene says:

    I want to make a comment to Robin about fluoride. I grew up in west Texas where the water is naturally heavily fluoridated. Children growing up there have heavily stained teeth unless they drink bottled water. I was born there in 1944 and lived there until a young adult with the stained teeth because my mother couldn’t afford to buy bottled water. Here’s the point I want to make. All my molar’s had several fillings by the time I was 16. The fluoride did nothing to prevent the cavities.

  • Bob Down says:

    Darlene, your argument doesn’t hold. You state that flouride did nothing to prevent your cavities but you provide no proof. A proof would be “how many cavities did you get by not drinking flouridated water” – it could have been twice as many as you had. My impression is that no-one claims that flouridation prevents cavities – the claim is to my understanding that it reduces the incidence of cavities (but it can’t prevent them because there are other factors at play e.g. the care people take of their teeth – I’d say that one is a more material influence on the health of your teeth. Be careful making statements that you can’t back up.

  • Andrew Wiggin says:

    Hey Bob, how about you actually make a statement. Tell us where you stand. Yeah I agree Darlene doesn’t make a very sound case against fluoride, but that doesn’t mean that “your impression” is a solid defense of Fluoride.

    Lets start logically, prove to me that consuming fluoride does ANYTHING positive for teeth.

    Prove to me that consuming fluoride does no harm to the rest of the body.

    Show me evidence where giving an unregulated dose of any medication to young and old, infirm and healthy, has EVER been a good idea.

    How about we start dosing the water with Paxil and Prozac? No, why not? There are a lot of people that are depressed. Lets do it. Why wouldn’t that be a good idea?

    Now think outside the box and apply those same principles to the Fluoride dilemma.

    For starters, there is evidence to prove that Fluoride does NOTHING beneficial for teeth topically.

    But lets assume it did. There is no reason to swallow it.

    Besides, there are multiple forms of Fluoride and what you get in your water supply and what you get in your toothpaste are two very different chemicals.

    Want to really know why we have fluoride in our toothpaste?

    Do you?

    Do the research yourself. You can ignore me, thats fine, I am not very tactful. But you can’t ignore the truth, IF you do the research and use your reasoning ability, you will understand, if you want to.

  • Mae G says:

    In the early 1930′s, Fluoride came about as a by-product of
    making aluminum. There were piles of it just sitting around. The
    Health Dept. told the aluminum industry that the Fluoride could
    not be used for anything but rat poison because it was so toxic.
    What I cannot find out is who decided to create something from
    Fluoride for “protecting” teeth? Also, was it called something
    else and was renamed Fluoride? What kind of person thinks of
    taking a very toxic substance and creating something for use
    on people. He/she thought there aren’t enough rats to use it on?
    In our area in 1963 we had Fluoride tablets to put in milk.
    Some people thought if one tablet is good, two or more should be
    really good. They tried it and got very sick. I do not recall
    hearing about any deaths. Toxic! Yet, they decided to put the
    stuff in our water. Back then bottled water was not an option.
    Makes you wonder what else some Dr. Frankenstein has decided
    to make. Some genetically altered food and animals to eat?

  • MANNY says:

    On every tube of toothpaste there is a warning label on the back
    of the tube stating that if you should accidentally swallow toothpaste
    in a greater amount,than the normal amount used for brushing, that you should seek medical help immediately or call poison control..
    Poison control??? so if you swallow a small amount during brushing teeth, a small amount of poison is ok?

  • Jo says:

    I just had 4 root canal teeth pulled in the last 4 months. 2 were cracked but all were infected. 2 practically fell out when he went to extract. I have 2 more that are hurting, and have been for years, just like the others, but I was told they looked great on x-ray. They too are coming out within the next month. These root canals are 15 – 20 years old. I suffered for about 8 years with one on the bottom root canals. My lymph node on my jaw line was always swollen and hurt, but, since they said the x-ray was fine, I just thought maybe it was sinus problems, and I left it. When they pulled that tooth, the pain went away, and my jaw line is fine now. On the other side of my neck, I had a nickel size lump which I had the doctor look at and the chiropractor and they said it was a swollen joint. I painfully had massages and ultrasound done on it for the past 2 1/2 years. This past week, I had a lower, old root canal tooth pulled, which had been sore for years. That painful ‘swollen joint’?…gone. It was an infected lymph node from that tooth. Unfortunately, the 2 upper root canal teeth I had pulled were infected, now the last root canal tooth next to them is hurting. It went right down the line. 3 root canal teeth in a row, gone bad. I will also have it extracted very soon. I do not trust root canals and will never have another one. With all 4 being so infected, no wonder I haven’t felt well for years. I plan on having an implant bridge put in where the 3 root canal teeth were or honestly, for now just wear a partial. I know people who have root canals and no problems, but for me, I do not have a strong immune system and they ‘attack’ me. Here’s to being root canal free by October! :)

  • marie says:

    I do have some root canals that i have had now for a few years or more/Are you proposing I pull all my teeth out and have no teeth to chew food etc. Seems like I am in a uncomfortable place. I have had no trouble with any of them and enjoy good health….I see your point andprobably would have a tooth pulled now rather than a root canal done. Not sure what to do now….Seems severe to pull all my teeth out.

  • alex says:

    makes one wonder…
    my grandpa had a lot of root canals for several decades, yet he lived a healthy life – died of old age. Does this theory apply only to some people? Plus, root canals done 40-50 years ago were nowhere near as “good” as those done nowadays. The truth is out there, but I find the article biased. Plus…what’s the alternative? Remove the tooth and have a bridge – which is going to mess up the 2 adjacent hopefully healthy teeth, or have an ($$$$) implant?

  • adidas factory says:

    Minimal Routine maintenance

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.